Master’s research / Urban building energy

Building Alignment

A parametric study of how the alignment and distribution of buildings quietly reshape block-level energy demand.

Role
Lead researcher & computational workflow
Period
2021 — 2024
Status
Research complete / manuscript development
Stack
Grasshopper / Python / EnergyPlus
Urban morphologyAlignment metricUBEMTehran
Question

If building size and specifications stay fixed, can the arrangement of the block still change its energy demand?

Response

The study generated controlled alignment families along X, Y, and XY axes, simulated them under identical conditions, and compared heating, cooling, and primary energy.

16 buildings per prototype block
400 parametric simulations
50 cross-validation cases
2.42% possible primary-energy reduction
01

From visual order to measurable parameter

Alignment is usually discussed as a visual property of urban form. This research reframed it as a normalized geometric variable that can be generated, compared, and related to performance.

Three model families tested misalignment along one or both axes while keeping footprints, height, envelope, schedules, and total floor area constant.

02

Experimental loop

  1. 01

    Define

    Translate point-and-line alignment concepts into a block-scale geometric measure.

  2. 02

    Generate

    Create X, Y, and XY families with uniform and non-uniform distributions.

  3. 03

    Simulate

    Run controlled heating, cooling, thermal-load, and primary-energy evaluations.

  4. 04

    Compare

    Read trendlines per axis instead of forcing one universal alignment rule.

03

Method

Parametric generation, energy simulation and analysis workflow
A controlled geometry-to-performance workflow for a representative Tehran block.
04

Findings

Direction matters

X, Y, and combined misalignment do not produce the same heating and cooling trends.

Distribution matters

Layouts with the same alignment value can perform differently when their offsets are distributed differently.

Small percentages scale

Potential reductions reached about 1.25% for heating, 3.1% for cooling, and 2.42% for primary energy.

Symmetry is not performance

Regular and visually ordered arrangements were not automatically the most energy-efficient alternatives.

05

Validation

The study isolates alignment deliberately. Its results should be read as evidence that layout is consequential, not as a universal prescription for every climate, density, programme, or urban context.

Building Alignment validation results
Fifty cases were cross-checked; the reported maximum variance was approximately 0.4 kWh/m².
06

What followed

A research seed

The project opened several later questions — contextual influence, shadow distance, WWR, geometry metrics, and climatic form-finding. Those are related research lines, but they are not presented here as if they were one experiment.

07

Research team

Hossein Nazari with Abbas Tarkashvand and Mohsen Faizi, Iran University of Science and Technology.

Project animation

Page